next up previous contents index
Next: Angle Sums (again) Up: Hyperbolic Geometry Previous: Hyperbolic Geometry

The Hyperbolic Axiom and its Consequences

What is hyperbolic geometry? It is an example of one of many non-euclidean geometries. It is often called Bolyai-Lobachevskiian geometry  after two of its discovers János Bolyai  and Nikolai Ivanovich Lobachevsky . Bolyai first announced his discoveries in a 26 page appendix to a book by his father, the Tentamen, in 1831. You can read about what happened to him and his work in the text. Another of the great mathematicians who seems to have preceeded Bolyai in his work is Carl Fredrich Gauss . He seems to have done some work in the area dating from 1792, but never published it. The first to publish a complete account of non-euclidean geometry was Lobachevsky in 1829. It was first published in Russian and was not widely read. In 1840 he published a treatise in German.

We shall add one more axiom to the list of axioms for Neutral Geometry.

HYPERBOLIC AXIOM: In hyperbolic geometry there exists a line tex2html_wrap_inline11154 and a point P not on tex2html_wrap_inline11154 such that at least two distinct lines parallel to tex2html_wrap_inline11154 pass through P.

figure3248

We shall denote the set of all points in the plane by tex2html_wrap_inline15734, and call this the hyperbolic plane. 

Lemma 12.1:  There exists a triangle whose angle sum is less than tex2html_wrap_inline11150.

figure3266

Proof: Let tex2html_wrap_inline11154 be a line and P a point not on tex2html_wrap_inline11154 such that two parallels to tex2html_wrap_inline11154 pass through P. We can construct one of these parallels as previously done using perpendiculars. Let Q be the foot of the perpendicular to tex2html_wrap_inline11154 through P. Let m be the perpendicular to tex2html_wrap_inline15614 through P. Then m and tex2html_wrap_inline11154 are non-intersecting. Let n be another line through P which does not intersect tex2html_wrap_inline11154. This line exists by the Hyperbolic Axiom. Let tex2html_wrap_inline15776 be a ray of n lying between tex2html_wrap_inline13456 and a ray tex2html_wrap_inline15782 of m.

CLAIM: There is a point tex2html_wrap_inline15786 on the same side of tex2html_wrap_inline15614 as X and Y so that tex2html_wrap_inline15794.

PROOF OF CLAIM. The idea is to construct a sequence of angles
displaymath15712
so that tex2html_wrap_inline15796. We will then apply Archimedes Axiom for real numbers to complete the proof.

There is a point tex2html_wrap_inline15798 so that tex2html_wrap_inline15800. Then tex2html_wrap_inline15802 is isosceles and tex2html_wrap_inline15804. Also, there is a point tex2html_wrap_inline15806 so that tex2html_wrap_inline15808 and tex2html_wrap_inline15810. Then tex2html_wrap_inline15812 is isosceles and tex2html_wrap_inline15814. Since tex2html_wrap_inline15816 is exterior to tex2html_wrap_inline15812 it follows that
displaymath15713
so then tex2html_wrap_inline15820. Continuing with this construction, we find a point tex2html_wrap_inline15822 so that tex2html_wrap_inline15824 and
displaymath15714
Applying the Archimedean axiom we see that for any positive real number, for example tex2html_wrap_inline15826, there is a point tex2html_wrap_inline15786 so that R is on the same side of tex2html_wrap_inline15614 as X and Y and tex2html_wrap_inline15838. Thus, we have proved our claim.

Now, tex2html_wrap_inline15840 lies in the interior of tex2html_wrap_inline15842, for if not then tex2html_wrap_inline15776 is in the interior of tex2html_wrap_inline15846. By the Crossbar Theorem it follows that tex2html_wrap_inline15848 which implies that n and tex2html_wrap_inline11154 are not non-intersecting--a contradiction. Thus, tex2html_wrap_inline15854. Then,
displaymath15715
Therefore, tex2html_wrap_inline15856 and tex2html_wrap_inline15858.

The Hyperbolic Axiom only hypothesizes the existence of one line and one point not on that line for which there are two non-intersecting lines. With the above theorem we can now prove a much stronger theorem.

Theorem 12.1:[Universal Hyperbolic Theorem] In tex2html_wrap_inline15734 for every line tex2html_wrap_inline11154 and for every point P not on tex2html_wrap_inline11154 there pass through P at least two distinct lines, neither of which intersect tex2html_wrap_inline11154.

figure3332

Proof: Drop a perpendicular tex2html_wrap_inline15614 to tex2html_wrap_inline11154 and construct a line m through P perpendicular to tex2html_wrap_inline15614. Let R be any other point on tex2html_wrap_inline11154, and construct a perpendicular t to tex2html_wrap_inline11154 through R. Now, let S be the foot of the perpendicular to t through P. Now, tex2html_wrap_inline15620 does not intersect tex2html_wrap_inline11154 since both are perpendicular to t. At the same time tex2html_wrap_inline15910. Assume that tex2html_wrap_inline15912, then tex2html_wrap_inline15222 is a rectangle. By Theorem 11.5, if one rectangle exists all triangles have defect 0. We have a contradiction to Lemma 13.1. Thus, tex2html_wrap_inline15910, and we are done.


next up previous contents index
Next: Angle Sums (again) Up: Hyperbolic Geometry Previous: Hyperbolic Geometry

droyster@math.uncc.edu