next up previous contents index
Next: Strange New Triangles Up: Classification of Parallels Previous: Classification of Parallels

Proof of Claim and Asymptotic Triangles

If tex2html_wrap_inline16144 and tex2html_wrap_inline17364 are limiting parallel rays, the convention is to pretend that they pass through an ideal point tex2html_wrap_inline17366.  We then denote the rays by tex2html_wrap_inline17368 and tex2html_wrap_inline17370. The figure consisting of these rays and the segment PQ is called a singly asymptotic triangle . You can have doubly asymptotic triangles, with 2 ideal points, and trebly asymptotic triangles, with 3 ideal points.

Lemma 13.3:[Exterior Angle Theorem]  If tex2html_wrap_inline17374 is a singly asymptotic triangle, the exterior angles at P and Q are greater than their respective opposite interior angles.

figure3993

Proof: Choose tex2html_wrap_inline17398 so that tex2html_wrap_inline17400. We need to show that tex2html_wrap_inline17402.

There is a unique ray tex2html_wrap_inline17364 lying on the same side of tex2html_wrap_inline15614 as tex2html_wrap_inline17366 so that tex2html_wrap_inline17410. If tex2html_wrap_inline17412 is so that tex2html_wrap_inline17414, then tex2html_wrap_inline17416. Thus, we have that the alternate interior angles are congruent. Let M be the midpoint of PQ and let A and B be the feet of M in tex2html_wrap_inline17428 and tex2html_wrap_inline17430, respectively. By AAS tex2html_wrap_inline17432 so that tex2html_wrap_inline15366 and tex2html_wrap_inline17436. Thus, A, M, and B are collinear. Thus, tex2html_wrap_inline17428 and tex2html_wrap_inline17430 have a common perpendicular. Thus, tex2html_wrap_inline17448. Thus tex2html_wrap_inline17364 lies between tex2html_wrap_inline17452 and tex2html_wrap_inline17454, from which it follows that tex2html_wrap_inline17402.

Lemma 13.4:  If in the singly asymptotic triangles tex2html_wrap_inline17458 and tex2html_wrap_inline17460 we have tex2html_wrap_inline17462, then
displaymath17358

figure4030

Proof: First, let us assume that tex2html_wrap_inline12592 but tex2html_wrap_inline17480. We may suppose that tex2html_wrap_inline17482. Then, there is a unique ray tex2html_wrap_inline17484 between tex2html_wrap_inline17486 and tex2html_wrap_inline13314 so that tex2html_wrap_inline17490. Since tex2html_wrap_inline17492 and tex2html_wrap_inline17486 are limiting parallel, tex2html_wrap_inline17484 must intersect tex2html_wrap_inline17492 in a point X. There is a point tex2html_wrap_inline17502 so that tex2html_wrap_inline17504. Then by SAS tex2html_wrap_inline17506. Therefore, tex2html_wrap_inline17508. Then, tex2html_wrap_inline17510 and tex2html_wrap_inline17512 are not limiting parallel, a contradiction.

Now assume that tex2html_wrap_inline17514 and tex2html_wrap_inline13632. We may then assume that AB>CD. There is a unique point tex2html_wrap_inline17520 so that tex2html_wrap_inline17522. Let tex2html_wrap_inline17524 be the limiting parallel ray to tex2html_wrap_inline17492 from P. Thus, tex2html_wrap_inline17524 is also parallel to tex2html_wrap_inline17486. The first part of this proof now implies tex2html_wrap_inline17534. But tex2html_wrap_inline17536 is exterior to tex2html_wrap_inline17538, by the Exterior Angle Theorem tex2html_wrap_inline17540, a contradiction.

Corollary: tex2html_wrap_inline17542 if and only if tex2html_wrap_inline17544.

We are now in a position to show that tex2html_wrap_inline17314.

figure4071

Let tex2html_wrap_inline17548, tex2html_wrap_inline17550, and tex2html_wrap_inline17552. Recall that tex2html_wrap_inline17554 and tex2html_wrap_inline17310. By Lemma 14.4 tex2html_wrap_inline17558. Choose a point tex2html_wrap_inline17560 so that tex2html_wrap_inline17562.

Since m and n were not limiting parallel lines, we have that tex2html_wrap_inline17568 and tex2html_wrap_inline17570. Now, tex2html_wrap_inline17572 by Angle Subtraction. Since tex2html_wrap_inline17550, tex2html_wrap_inline17576, and tex2html_wrap_inline17552, we must have that tex2html_wrap_inline17580. Thus, tex2html_wrap_inline17582 is exterior to the singly asymptotic triangle tex2html_wrap_inline17584. Therefore, tex2html_wrap_inline17586. This means that tex2html_wrap_inline17588 lies between tex2html_wrap_inline17590 and tex2html_wrap_inline17592, which implies that tex2html_wrap_inline17590 lies between tex2html_wrap_inline17588 and tex2html_wrap_inline17598. But since tex2html_wrap_inline17550, we have that
displaymath17359
Since tex2html_wrap_inline17602, it lies on the same side of tex2html_wrap_inline17604 as does A'. Thus, A and J are on opposite sides of tex2html_wrap_inline17604. Thus, tex2html_wrap_inline17614. But, tex2html_wrap_inline17616 since H lies on the same side of tex2html_wrap_inline17306 as does J.

It is possible to construct the limiting parallel ray to a line through a given point with a compass and straightedge. Let tex2html_wrap_inline13682 and let Q be the foot of P in tex2html_wrap_inline11154. Let m be perpendicular to tex2html_wrap_inline15614 at P so that tex2html_wrap_inline17638. Let tex2html_wrap_inline15786, tex2html_wrap_inline17642 and let S be the foot of R in m. Then tex2html_wrap_inline15222 is a Lambert quadrilateral and PS<QR. QR<PR since PR is a hypotenuse. Take a circle centered at P of radius QR. S is inside this circle and R is outside this circle. There is a unique point tex2html_wrap_inline17666 where RS intersects the circle. One can show that the ray tex2html_wrap_inline15776 is limiting parallel to tex2html_wrap_inline11154!

figure4115


next up previous contents index
Next: Strange New Triangles Up: Classification of Parallels Previous: Classification of Parallels

droyster@math.uncc.edu